Cognitively Yours 1.3
“Investing is a continuous process too; it isn't supposed to be interesting"
In the
previous blogs, we discussed how mental shortcuts lead to biases which result
in sub-optimal investment decisions. We had also seen how fear of regret affects
our decision to invest. In the previous blogs, we also discussed how impatience
and need for instant gratification make us hardwired to short term.
We somehow
overcome these biases and invest. We track our investments. Do we allow them to
settle and then review the rewards? Most of us do not give time for investments
to flower. “Investing is a continuous process too; it isn't supposed to be
interesting. ...Benign neglect is the secret to
long-term investing success. If you change
your investment policy, you are likely to be wrong; if you change it
with a sense of urgency, you're guaranteed to be wrong”. We do like to see
quick results, we also love to be doing something, as opposed to be doing
something.
An
interesting research of the penalty kicks of soccer from top leagues and
championships worldwide revelated that the penalty kicks were equally
distributed with one third of the kicks aimed at the right, center of the goal
mouth. However, the goalkeepers displayed a distinct action bias. They dived
either left or right 94% of the time hardly ever choosing to remain at the
center of the goal post. Yet, they would have been much more successful, had
they remained at the center of the goal post.
Remaining at the center of the goal post, he would have saved 60 per
cent of the kicks aimed at the center, far more than his saving rate, when he
dives to the left or right. However, the goal keepers remain at the center only
6 per cent of the times. The defense given by the goal keepers was that they
feel that they are making an effort to stop the goal by diving to the left or
right, whereas standing at the center and seeing the goal scored to the left or
right of you would make you feel much worse. In reality, nothing would be worse
than losing, regardless of where you stand.
In
investments too, many a time, there is a distinct bias for action. True, there
are times when corrective action is requited, and one has to act. But many a
time, when it requires sometimes for investment decisions to show results, we
tend to make too many changes in too short a time resulting in the entire
investment decision going awry. This is like not allowing milk to which two
spoons of curd is added to ferment, but in the hope of quickening the process,
stirring the milk at frequent intervals. The end result that the curd is unfit
for consumption.
"Don't underestimate the value of Doing Nothing, of just going along, listening to all the things you can't hear, and not bothering."-A A Milne.
As Blaise Pascal put it “All of human unhappiness comes from one single thing: not remaining at rest in a room”.
In investment, we should need to differentiate what needs corrective action and where status quo have to be maintained.
I love the term “ Benign neglect “ . Can vouch for the efficacy of that . Guess post that the skill needed is to consolidate .. when to sell or asset allocate
ReplyDeleteComparing investment result with soccer penalty kicks or curd making does not capture its extreme uncertainty. Try comparing it with future of technology development to get some sense.
ReplyDelete